DOI 10.37749/2308-9636-2019-11(203)-3
Krupchan O. D., Gaydulin O. O. Europeanization of private law as a hermeneutic and civilistics problem: an approach to the interpretation law institutionalization.
The article deals with the problems of the civilistic institutionalization of the interpretation law in the context of the Europeanization of private law. The basis of this study is the application of civilistic methods to investigate this problem.
This article deals with the comprehensive study of the legal integration of the private law systems of the EU Member States and other European countries. In Comparative Law, this process is called Europeanization of private law. This is a broad topic that raises many questions. The issue of Europeazation of private law is an extremely multi-faceted problem. The current economic crisis is a challenge for the Europeanization of private law.
There is a need to exchange experience in interpreting the concept of European Private Law after the 2016 Brexit referendumand to propose a common way of a coherent Europeanization policy strategy on this basis. In this context, Europeanization can be defined equally simply and broadly as a type regional international integration.
However, this meaning is not so simple. Suddenly, after the 2016 Brexit, EU self-identification with all Europe is destroyed by one act. All this happened because level of European Union identification was very excessive. European academic lawyers spoke about it previously. In particular, it was stressed that they do not subscribe to the overly
European Union-centric notion «Europe» that the term «Europeanization» implies. However, they went along with the widely used term «Europeanization», while noting its obvious inaccuracy. The «extremist wing of the Europeanization brigade» have tended to view the European states as little more than passive recipients duly implementing dictate of Brussels.
Now Europeanization of private law for all EU member states should be understood as the «EU-ization», but it should take the form of a legal harmonization too. Europeanization of private law for all States, including Ukraine, should be interpreted as the legal cultural process or the common base of the harmonization of laws.
And for this purpose academic lawyers should use this term as referring to the cross-culture comparing of legal paradigms at the domestic level. These paradigms could be the keys for understanding the legal convergence problem. They go to the very heart of the national (domestic) legal systems in Europe.
Under these conditions, the concept of codification of private law in the form of a European civil code is hopelessly outdated. More promising is the way to approximate the mechanisms of legal interpretation. Indeed, there are all indications of the formation of a new civilistic institute, called the right of interpretation. This institute comes from ancient Roman ius interpretatio. That is why this modern institutionalization is a reception of Roman law interpretation.
The article concludes that a coherent methodology is needed to clarify the process of institutionalizing the law interpretation. Therefore, there is a need to develop a new type of doctrine – the civilistic theory of law of interpretation.
Key words: European private law, Europeazation of private law, law of interpretation, doctrine, civilistic methodology.
References
Association Agreement between the European Union and Its Member States, of the One Part, and Ukraine, of the Other Part. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://glavcom.ua/pub/2012_11_19_EU_Ukraine_Association_Agreement_English. pdf; URL: http://comeuroint.rada.gov.ua/komevroint/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=56220&cat_id=45826.
Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, vol. I, Resolutions Adopted by the Conference (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.93.I.8 and corrigendum), resolution 1, annex I, II.
Daly, H. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development / Her
Ukrainian Private Law and the European Area of Justice (Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, 127) / ed. by Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer and Rainer Kulms. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2019. XI. 321 p. man E. Daly. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996. 253 P.
Busygina I. Asymmetric integration in the European Union // International processes. 2007. No. 3. P. 18–27. URL: http://intertrends.ru/fifteen/002. htm.
Gaidulin O. O. Approach of contract law in European countries: monograph. Kiev: Publisher Pozdnyshev 2009. 239 P.
Gaidulin O. O. Europe contract law: monograph. – Kyiv: KNEU, 2012.293 P.
Gaidulin O. O. Tlumachenyi rights in the European contract law and contract law of Ukraine: a parallel analysis of those hatreds // Problems of regulation of private law in the minds of regional and global transformations. ed. O. D. Krupchan. Kiev: Science and Research Institute of Private Law and Law of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2012. P. 102–134.
Sirotkina O. V. Principles of European contract law: the history of creation, status and main provisions // Collection of scientific papers. Series “Law”. Vol. No. 1 (5). Stavropol: SevKavSTU, 2003. P. 58–67.
The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe / еdited by Frank Schimmelfennig, Ulrich Sedelmeier. Cornell University Press, 2005. P. 1.
Lando О. Some Features of the Law of Contract in the Third Millenium // Scandinavian Studies in Law. 2000. № 40. Р. 343–402.
Jessel-Holst, C. EU Harmonization of Private Law as Exemplified in South-East European Countries / Christa Jessel-Holst // Ukrainian Private Law and the European Area of Justice (Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, 127) / еd. by Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer and Rainer Kulms. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2019. P. 309–318.
Lando O. Guest Editorial: European Contract Law after the year 2000 // Common Market Law Review 1998. № 35. Р. 821–831.
Carozza P. G. Mу friend is a stranger»: the death penalty and the global ius commune of human rights // Texas Law Review. 2003. № 81. Р. 1031–1089.
Zweigert K., Ketz Hein. Introduction to comparative law in the field of private law: in 2 volumes / Konrad Zweigert, Hein Kötz. T. I. Basics: translation from german. M.: Intern. Relations. 2000. 480 P.
Fedyak G. S. Legal personality of transnational corporations at the time of globalization processes (aspects of international law and international private law): monograph. Kyiv: Atika, 2007. 200 P.
Gaydulin O. O. New Concepts in Europeazation of Private Law after the 2016 Brexit Referendum: Some Experience in Interpretation of Law // Legal Regulation of the Economy: Collection of Research Works. Kyiv: KNEU, 2017, No. 15. P. 223–230.
Majdanyk R. A. Development of Ukrainian Private Law in the Context of its Europeanization // Ukrainian Private Law and the European Area of Justice (Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, 127) / еd. by Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer and Rainer Kulms. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2019. P. 143–180.
David R., Joffre-Spinozi K. Basic legal systems of our time [ trans. with fr. V. A. Tumanova]. M.: Intern. Relations. 1999.400 P.
Fustel de Coulange ND Ancient civil community: Studies on the cult, law, institutions of Greece and Rome / trans. with fr. N. N. Spiridonova; 3rd ed. Moscow: KRASAND, 2011. 354 P.
Levitska O. Rigorism // Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary / V. І. Shinkaruk (Ed.); L.V. Ozadovska, N.P. Polischuk (Science. Ed.). Kiev: Institute of Philosophy and Name Grigory Skovorody NAS of Ukraine. Abris. 2002. 742 P.